Drawing for SOFT'N LOVELY

USPTO serial 73820089

SOFT'N LOVELY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SZOKE, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOFT'N LOVELY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK H. SPARROW

MARK H SPARROW JACOBS & JACOBS, PC521 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10175UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003BABY SHAMPOO, BABY OIL, HAND AND BODY CREAM LOTION, SKIN LOTION AND LIQUID HAND SOAPABANDONEDJun 25, 1980

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 2, 1992EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 10, 1992ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 10, 1992EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 12, 1991NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Mar 28, 1991JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 28, 1991EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 22, 1991ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 2, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 24, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance