USPTO serial 74006950
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARLAND C. BOOTHE, JR.
GARLAND C BOOTHE JR AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANYONE CYANAMID PLZWAYNE, NJ 07470UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SKIN LOTIONS AND SKIN CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SKIN CREAM, FACE CREAM, BODY CREAM, BODY LOTION, BODY GEL AND HAND CREAM | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 4, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 16, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 18, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 30, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 29, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 25, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |