USPTO serial 74014099
SANO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITAKER, LAURIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SANO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Ehrlich
DAVID EHRLICH WEISS DAWID FROSS ZELNICK & LEHRMAN, PC633 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cleaning and polishing preparations for household or domestic use, namely, all purpose cleaning preparation; floor wax; cleaning preparations for windows and glass; floor polish; preparation for removing floor wax; all purpose scouring powder; cleaning preparation for ovens; cleaning preparation for removing grease; cleaning preparation for toilet bowls; carpet cleaning preparation; laundry spray starch; spot remover; stain removing preparation for pre-laundry treatment of clothing; protective preparation for leather and suede; metal polish; furniture polish; drain opener; cleaning preparations for automobiles; automobile wax; and cleaning preparation for automobile windows | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | air freshener for domestic use; air freshener for automobiles; insecticides for domestic use; and personal insect repellant | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | toilet paper; disposable diapers; and plastic wrap | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sano-Brunos Enterprises Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Sano-Brunos Enterprises Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named SANO
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 1992 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 9, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 1991 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 12, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 8, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |