Drawing for PLAY 'N GO

USPTO serial 74025148

PLAY 'N GO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COHEN, JEFFREY R.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLAY 'N GO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin G. Smith

KEVIN G SMITH SHOEMAKER AND MATTARE, LTD2001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY STE 1203P O BOX 2286ARLINGTON, VA 22202-0286

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028toys; namely, soft bodied dolls and figures with accessories therefor; stuffed figures; bendable figures; soft plush and vinyl and fabric toys; plastic playsets; and infant toysABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 1992ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 12, 1991PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 11, 1991NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 12, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 19, 1991CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 22, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance