USPTO serial 74040773
TAZZA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUNN, ELIZABETH A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TAZZA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald B. Hildreth
RONALD B HILDRETH BRUMBAUGH, GRAVES, DONOHUE & RAYMOND30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | hot and cold dispensing apparatus for drinks such as chocolate and tea | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | glassware, porcelain and earthenware; namely, plates, bowls, basins, soup tureens, jugs, watering cans, cooking pots, and flower pots | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | clothing for men, women and children; namely, coats, jackets, trousers, skirts, dressing gowns, shirts, hats, caps, slippers, boots, shoes | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | cocoa, chocolate concentrate, cocoa concentrate, and tea | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | advertising; marketing research; business management and organization consulting and assistance; franchising services; namely, offering assistance in the establishment and/or operation of restaurants | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | publication of books and texts; organization of competitions; entertainment, production of shows; film production; production of radio and television programs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PAULING LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named TAZZA
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 1991 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 26, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1991 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |