Drawing for COGEN

USPTO serial 74048932

COGEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1853504Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 13, 1994
Examiner
GLYNN, GERALD
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with COGEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

A. Stuart Nickles, III

10301 Wilson BoulevardLegal Dept - 2L3Blythewood, SC 29016

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer programs for mainframe computers for use in the administration of property and casualty and health insurance companiesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJun 4, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2016CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Aug 25, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 28, 2005RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jan 28, 200589AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Dec 7, 200489AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Dec 7, 2004E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
May 30, 2001C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 16, 2001PR23RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 15—
Oct 31, 2000PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Jul 11, 2000815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Sep 13, 1994R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 21, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 20, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 3, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 10, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 24, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 7, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 1993CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 21, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 2, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 1, 1992CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 15, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 7, 1992JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 31, 1991EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 17, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 28, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance