USPTO serial 74053007
SALES PERFECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SALES PERFECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurence P. Colton
LAURENCE P COLTON DEVEAU, COLTON & MARQUISTWO MIDTOWN PLZ STE 14001360 PEACHTREE ST N EATLANTA, GA 30309-3209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs for accomplishing and educating users in methods of sales and sales techniques | ABANDONED | Mar 1, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 31, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 31, 1994 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 3, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 12, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 11, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |