USPTO serial 74056174
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ernest I. Gifford
ERNEST I GIFFORD GIFFORD, GROH, SPRINKLE, PATMORE, ET AL280 N WOODWARD, STE 400BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer consulting service and custom design of computer software for data processing | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1989 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 20, 1994 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Dec 7, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 19, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 16, 1993 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 7, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 1, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 5, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 4, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |