USPTO serial 74058104
HARDY AMIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEDERSEN, CHRIS A F
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HARDY AMIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Clarke Holman
JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN FLEIT JACOBSON COHN PRICE HOLMAN & STERN400 7TH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | after and pre-shave lotions, cologne, perfume, eau du toilette, emulsion creams and lotions, shave and facial creams and foams, hair lotions, tonics, creams, jels, sprays, colourants and liquid dressings, talcum and dusting powders, personal deodorant and anti-perspirant, bath, hand and body lotions, foundation cream, face powder, facial creams, facial masks, eye creams, liner, shadow and pencil, lipstick, nail polish and creams, cosmetic facial cleansers, facial lotions, facial toning lotions, bath soap and hair shampoo | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 16, 1995 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 1995 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1994 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 1994 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 14, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 13, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |