USPTO serial 74058130
VERSAILLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FALK, ERIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VERSAILLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
6236 Eschborn bei Frankfort, DE
6236 Eschborn bei Frankfort, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles N. Quinn
CHARLES N QUINN MILLER & QUINNBROAD & CHESTNUT STS1125 LAND TITLE BLDGPHILADELPHIA, PA 19110Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | digitized typefaces stored in electrical data carriers, diskettes; character carriers of glass, plastics, and/or exposed photographic film; namely, transparencies, especially negatives, bearing alphabets or letters and characters, which are collectively referred to as fonts, for typographic composition | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | letter and character fonts for display and reproduction, particularly for producing text by graphic techniques | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 1994 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 1994 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 22, 1994 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 21, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 1993 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 20, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1993 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 28, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |