Drawing for PYROPROOF BY CHARM-TEX

USPTO serial 74067658

PYROPROOF BY CHARM-TEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PYROPROOF BY CHARM-TEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William J. Thomashower

WILLIAM J THOMASHOWER KAPLAN, THOMASHOWER & LANDAU747 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024mattress pads and bed coversABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 1995ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 22, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 5, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 11, 1994CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jan 21, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 1993SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 9, 1993IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 20, 1992NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 28, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 26, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 14, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 26, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 10, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance