USPTO serial 74072817
DYNAPLAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DYNAPLAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark H. Sparrow
MARK H SPARROW JACOBS & JACOBS, PC521 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10175UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | bandages; namely, woven and non-woven bandages and dressings being made from natural or synthetic materials all being non-elastic and all for use in the treatment and prevention of injuries to the joints and limbs; material prepared for use in all the aforesaid types of bandage | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | bandages; namely, elastic bandages, support bandages and tubular bandages all for use in the treatment and prevention of injuries to the joints and limbs; material prepared for use in all the aforesaid types of bandage | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by T.J. SMITH AND NEPHEW LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by T.J. SMITH AND NEPHEW LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named DYNAPLAST
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 1992 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 7, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 16, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 24, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |