USPTO serial 74073163
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
South Hill, VA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberly S. Lebar
KIMBERLY S LEBAR MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHEONE JAMES CTRRICHMOND, VA 23219UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing; namely, coatssold in applicants's store | ABANDONED | Sep 1, 1990 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1992 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 28, 1992 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 28, 1992 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 27, 1992 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 1990 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 1, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 1990 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 10, 1990 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |