USPTO serial 74074651
BAUKNECHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JEFFRIES, STEPHEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BAUKNECHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Benton Harbor, MI
Benton Harbor, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Retha J. Martin
RETHA J MARTIN WHIRLPOOL CORPORATIONLAW DEPT ADMINISTRATIVE CTR2000 M-63BENTON HARBOR, MI 49022Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | clothes washing machine, dishwasher, food waste disposal unit, food waste and trash compacting machine, compressors for refrigeration and air conditioning, electric food mixing machine and attachments therefor; namely, mixer beaters dough hooks, wire whips, food grinders, pasta makers fruit/vegetable strainers, sausage stuffers, slicer/shredders, grain mills, citrus juice extractors, can openers, hard plastic food mixing machine covers, sold together as a unit and separately | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 1993 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Nov 25, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 13, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 1, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 8, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |