USPTO serial 74097122
P.A.S.S.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with P.A.S.S.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank J. DeRosa
FRANK J DEROSA ROSEN, DAINOW & JACOBS489 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | automated passive aisle security system comprising apparatus for detecting the presence of a person in an open aisle; namely, safety floor apparatus and personal detectors, for use with or as part of mobile storage systems having movable storage elements | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Automated Storage & Retrieval Systems of America, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Automated Storage & Retrieval Systems of America, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named P.A.S.S.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 4, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 7, 1992 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 28, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |