USPTO serial 74097134
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Trident Videogram International Corp.
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Other trademarks owned by Trident Videogram International Corp.
Trident Videogram International Corp.
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Other trademarks owned by Trident Videogram International Corp.
Trident Videogram International Corp.
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Other trademarks owned by Trident Videogram International Corp.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna A. Rubelmann
DONNA A RUBELMANN SPENSLEY, HORN, JUBAS & LUBITZ1880 CENTURY PARK ESTE 500LOS ANGELES, CA 90067CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| May 10, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 15, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 9, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 1993 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 6, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 27, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 20, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |