Drawing for LE PETIT B.B.

USPTO serial 74098111

LE PETIT B.B.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LE PETIT B.B.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brewster Taylor

BREWSTER TAYLOR LARSON AND TAYLOR727 TWENTY-THIRD ST SARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003toilet water; cleansing milk for toilet purposes; cleansing liquid soap; shower cleansing liquid without soap; shampoo; toothpaste; all of the aforesaid goods being for children and babiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 24, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 5, 1996OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 5, 1996OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Apr 23, 1993OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 8, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 6, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 23, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 31, 1992DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 24, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 1992DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance