Drawing for LONDON COLLECTION

USPTO serial 74109480

LONDON COLLECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LONDON COLLECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

McPherson D. Moore

MCPHERSON D MOORE ARMSTRONG, TEASDALE, SCHLAFLY, ET ALONE METROPOLITAN SQSTE 2600ST LOUIS, MO 63102-2740

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025footwearABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 31, 1994ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 31, 1994EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 7, 1994CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 10, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 1993CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 18, 1993JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 18, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 18, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 2, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 30, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 1991UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance