USPTO serial 74112565
HANDEZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HANDEZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St. Petersburg, FL
St. Petersburg, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert W. Larson
HERBERT W LARSON PINEBROOK BUSINESS CTRSTE 4067381 114TH AVE NLARGO, FL 34643-5125Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | dynamic hand splint | ABANDONED | Sep 8, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 1, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 1995 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 23, 1995 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 30, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 27, 1995 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 1994 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 1994 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 17, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 1993 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 1993 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1993 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 1993 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1992 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 1992 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |