USPTO serial 74115230
VERY PRIVATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VERY PRIVATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Michael Cleary
J MICHAEL CLEARY CLEARY & KOMEN600 PENNSYLVANIA AVE S ESTE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20003-4304Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | powders, and deodorants; hair care preparations; namely, shampoos, conditioners, and styling gels; powders, deodorants, soaps, facial soaps, facial cleansing creams, facial moisturizing creams, facial lotions, facial moisturizing lotions, nourishing and corrective creams, skin repair creams, skin texturizers, skin conditioners; fragrances; namely, perfumes and colognes | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | spermicides and douches | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COTSEN, JACQUELINE B.
- Other trademarks owned by COTSEN, JACQUELINE B.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named VERY PRIVATE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 22, 1995 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 1995 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 8, 1994 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 1994 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1994 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 10, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 21, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 13, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |