USPTO serial 74115745
BLUE GIRL PILSENER LAGER BIER BREWED IN BREMEN, GERMANY EXCELSIOR SCHUTZ-MARKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1848686Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 9, 1994
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BLUE GIRL PILSENER LAGER BIER BREWED IN BREMEN, GERMANY EXCELSIOR SCHUTZ-MARKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bierbrauerei Wilhelm Remmer GmbH
D-2800 Bremen 1, DE
Bierbrauerei Wilhelm Remmer GmbH
D-2800 Bremen 1, DE
Bierbrauerei Wilhelm Remmer GmbH
D-2800 Bremen 1, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Toren
KATRIN LEWERTOFF SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP787 7TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | beer | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bierbrauerei Wilhelm Remmer GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Bierbrauerei Wilhelm Remmer GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Bierbrauerei Wilhelm Remmer GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named BLUE GIRL PILSENER LAGER BIER BREWED IN BREMEN, GERMANY EXCELSIOR SCHUTZ-MARKE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 9, 1996 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 27, 1994 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 8, 1994 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 7, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 6, 1993 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 6, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 12, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 6, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |