USPTO serial 74116413
URANTIA BROTHERHOOD ASSOCIATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with URANTIA BROTHERHOOD ASSOCIATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert R. Caliri
ROBERT R CALIRI EMRICH & DITHMARSTE 3000300 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | books, booklets, brochures, pamphlets, newsletters, bulletins and leaflets regarding one or more of the following subject matters -- science, education, art, philosophy, theology, history, current events, cosmology and religion | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 1999 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 17, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 16, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 21, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 19, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1994 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 24, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |