USPTO serial 74116414
URANTIA BROTHERHOOD ASSOCIATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2350375Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 16, 2000
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with URANTIA BROTHERHOOD ASSOCIATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert R. Caliri
ROBERT R CALIRI EMRICH & DITHMAR LLC125 S WACKER DR STE 2080CHICAGO, IL 60606-4401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs dealing with texts relating to various subject matters, namely, science, philosophy, education, art, theology, history, cosmology, and religion | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 26, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 11, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 23, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 10, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 20, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1994 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 20, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |