USPTO serial 74116470
AMORC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FALK, ERIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMORC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine C. Spelman
KATHERINE C SPELMAN TOWNSEND AND TOWNSENDONE MARKET PLZSTEUART ST TWR 20TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | prints and publications; namely, monograhs, printed lectures and monographs in the field of arts, sciences, psychology, philosophy, metaphysics and mysticism, educational pamphlets, books, monographs, brochures, newsletters, journals, and magazines in the field of arts, sciences, psychology, philosophy, metaphysics and mysticism and monthly magazines in the field of arts, sciences, psychology, philosophy, metaphysics and mysticism | ABANDONED | Apr 1, 1920 |
| 041 | educational services; namely, conducting classes and seminars in the field of arts, sciences, psychology, philosophy, metaphysics and mysticism | ABANDONED | Apr 1, 1920 |
| 042 | mail order catalogue services featuring products and material related to arts, sciences, psychology, philosophy, metaphysics and mysticism including books, pamphlets, monographs, prints, (art), jewelry, ritualistic accountrements (i.e., incense burners, aprons), tapes (both audio and video) | ABANDONED | Apr 1, 1920 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 1993 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 12, 1992 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |