Drawing for SEYBOLD SEMINARS

USPTO serial 74116553

SEYBOLD SEMINARS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1726110Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 20, 1992
Examiner
—
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with SEYBOLD SEMINARS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan L. Heller and Joseph Geisman

Susan L. Heller GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP1840 Century Park East, Suite 1900Los Angeles, CA 90067-2121UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035arranging and conducting trade show exhibitions in the fields of computers and publishingSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDDec 31, 1987
041arranging and conducting educational conferences and seminars in the fields of computers and publishingSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDDec 31, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2016CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
May 1, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 30, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2002RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Dec 16, 200289AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Sep 13, 200289AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Sep 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 1999C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 19, 1998815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Oct 20, 1992R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 28, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 26, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 6, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 26, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance