USPTO serial 74116756
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
84200 Carpentras, FR
84200 Carpentras, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin G. Mullen
MARTIN G MULLEN SANDLER, GREENBLUM & BERNSTEIN2920 S GLEBE RDARLINGTON, VA 22206UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machines and machine tools for use in the surface treatment of materials; namely, non-aqueous electrolytic baths | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | business management; namely, management of royalties, licensing surface coating patents, technology and technical skills related thereto; information storage and retrieval services in the field of coating of materials; and franchising services; namely, rendering technical assistance in the establishment and operation of aluminum coating services; arranging and conducting trade shows, exhibitions and conventions in the field of processing of metallic surfaces, of machines adapted to implement said processing, and the engineering connected to such processing methods | ABANDONED | — |
| 040 | materials treatment services; namely, galvanization and electrolytic oxidation services, applying protective coatings to metal and metallic surfaces, plating and metal coating services, metal tempering, silver plating, gilding, nickel plating, zinc coating, cadmium coating, metal polishing and soldering services | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | consultation services in the field of engineering and processing corresponding to the coating of materials to prevent corrosion, or as a surface treatment; industrial design services; engineering and engineering consulting services; industrial design services, project study and analysis for manufacturing projects; printing house and offset or lithographic printing services, technical research services, materials testing, computer programming, custom design of computer software | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 22, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 24, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |