Drawing for INTERALU

USPTO serial 74116756

INTERALU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JEFFRIES, STEPHEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTERALU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin G. Mullen

MARTIN G MULLEN SANDLER, GREENBLUM & BERNSTEIN2920 S GLEBE RDARLINGTON, VA 22206UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007machines and machine tools for use in the surface treatment of materials; namely, non-aqueous electrolytic bathsABANDONED—
035business management; namely, management of royalties, licensing surface coating patents, technology and technical skills related thereto; information storage and retrieval services in the field of coating of materials; and franchising services; namely, rendering technical assistance in the establishment and operation of aluminum coating services; arranging and conducting trade shows, exhibitions and conventions in the field of processing of metallic surfaces, of machines adapted to implement said processing, and the engineering connected to such processing methodsABANDONED—
040materials treatment services; namely, galvanization and electrolytic oxidation services, applying protective coatings to metal and metallic surfaces, plating and metal coating services, metal tempering, silver plating, gilding, nickel plating, zinc coating, cadmium coating, metal polishing and soldering servicesABANDONED—
042consultation services in the field of engineering and processing corresponding to the coating of materials to prevent corrosion, or as a surface treatment; industrial design services; engineering and engineering consulting services; industrial design services, project study and analysis for manufacturing projects; printing house and offset or lithographic printing services, technical research services, materials testing, computer programming, custom design of computer softwareABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 1993ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 1993NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 22, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 20, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 24, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 20, 1992CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 28, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 26, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance