USPTO serial 74116898
NBA HOOPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NBA HOOPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terese R. Cohen
TERESE R COHEN NBA PROPERTIES, INC645 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing namely, t-shirts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, tank tops, jerseys, shorts, pajamas, sport shirts, sweaters, belts, nightshirts, hats, warm-up suits, jackets, headbands, wristbands, bibs, hosiery and footwear | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | toys and sporting goods namely, basketballs, golf balls, playground balls, sports balls, rubber action balls, basketball nets, basketball pumps, basketball backboards, golf clubs, golf bags, computerized basketball table games, video game cartridges, basketball table top games, basketball board games, dolls, stuffed toys, and puzzles | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | confections, namely, candy and chewing gum | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NBA Properties, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NBA Properties, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named NBA HOOPS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 1, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 1, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 10, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 28, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |