USPTO serial 74117463
CENOURA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIGELL, CHARLES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CENOURA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neal S. Greenfield
NEAL S GREENFIELD SCULLY, SCOTT, MURPHY & PRESSER400 GARDEN CITY PLZGARDEN CITY, NY 11530UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | stockings, tights, slippers, overalls, trousers, shorts, skirts, pajamas, dresses, babygrow, night dresses, undershirts, pants, suits, dressing gowns, coats, blazers, jackets, rain coats, sport jackets, blouses, shirts, leotards, baby napkins, baby's shirts, baby's shoes, bodices, pull overs, vests, tennis shoes, shoes, carnival costumes and masks, bathing suits, breeches, anoraks, ski suits, ski trousers, tee-shirt, polo shirts, sweatshirts, scarf, gloves, caps, hair bands, neckerchiefs, ties, bands, hats, belts, suspenders, shoes, boots and sandals | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 1993 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 12, 1993 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 22, 1992 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 25, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 6, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |