USPTO serial 74117711
ALTUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SZOKE, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALTUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jo M. Fairbairn
JO M FAIRBAIRN KINNEY & LANGESTE 1500625 FOURTH AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415-1659Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | products for the care of natural and man-made hair; namely, finishing rinse, conditioner, shampoo, cleaner and styling gel | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 29, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 26, 1994 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 19, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 16, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |