USPTO serial 74117876
ARCTOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARCTOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kanata, Ontario, K2K 2E2, CA
Kanata, Ontario, K2K 2E2, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda S. Paine-Powell
LINDA S PAINE-POWELL WEGNER, CANTOR, MUELLER & PLAYERP O BOX 18218WASHINGTON, DC 20036-8218UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software in the field of engineering and education; computer utility programs; computer hardware products; namely, computers; teaching aids; namely, computer hardware in the area of engineering applications and education keyboard templates; microwave communication hardware products for computers; namely, modems, coders/decoders, encryption devices | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | manuals for computer software in the field of engineering design and for computer utility programs; teaching aids; namely, instruction and training manuals in the field of computers | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | training in the use of computer software | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | custom design of computer hardware and software for others | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Arctos Systems Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Arctos Systems Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ARCTOS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 2, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 10, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1991 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 3, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 25, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |