USPTO serial 74118084
EBONY AND IVORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EBONY AND IVORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MONSIEUR FLIX & MR. NORTON COOKIES INC.
St. Laurent, Province of Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by MONSIEUR FLIX & MR. NORTON COOKIES INC.
MONSIEUR FLIX & MR. NORTON COOKIES INC.
St. Laurent, Province of Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by MONSIEUR FLIX & MR. NORTON COOKIES INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick J. Coyne
JAMES M PACIOUS COLLIER SHANNON SCOTT PLLC3050 K ST NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5100UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | cookies, ice-cream and brownies | ABANDONED | Dec 20, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 9, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 1995 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 1994 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1994 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 1994 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 1993 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 17, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 8, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |