USPTO serial 74118226
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard D. Pinney
RICHARD D PINNEY253 MERRITT SQ STE 814MERRITT ISLAND, FL 32952UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | national and international scheduled, non-scheduled, and charter passenger/cargo air ambulance aircraft transport, repatriation and evacuation operations using customized jet aircraft fitted with specially designed Intensive Care Units (ICUs) and specifically designed for long range international operation with even the most serious medical cases on board | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 8, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 8, 1994 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 13, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 15, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 26, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |