USPTO serial 74118464
BOCA GRANDE CLUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1820186Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 8, 1994
- Examiner
- FRIEDMAN, RICHARD A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BOCA GRANDE CLUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Boca Grande, FL
BOCA GRANDE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
BOCA GRANDE, FL
Other trademarks owned by BOCA GRANDE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
Boca Grande, FL
Boca Grande, FL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | providing water resort and recreational facilities for members and guests; namely, athletic, boating, fishing and other water-related recreational facilities | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | restaurant services and providing banquet and social function facilities | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Boca Grande Club, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BOCA GRANDE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Boca Grande Club, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Boca Grande Club, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BOCA GRANDE CLUB
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2004 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 10, 2000 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 2, 2000 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 16, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 1993 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1992 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |