Drawing for CONCRETE-READY

USPTO serial 74118478

CONCRETE-READY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONCRETE-READY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CRAIG K. LEON

CRAIG K LEON55 HAYDEN AVELEXINGTON, MA 02173UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001sealed disintegratable paper bag containing one or more admixtures for modifying the properties of concreteABANDONEDSep 14, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 1994ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 9, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 30, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 30, 1994EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 18, 1993CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 23, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 24, 1993CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 8, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 1992CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 10, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 13, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance