Drawing for TOUCH OF GLITZ

USPTO serial 74118729

TOUCH OF GLITZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOUCH OF GLITZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dennis L. Thomte

DENNIS L THOMTE ZARLEY, MCKEE, THOMTE, ET ALSTE 3200801 GRAND AVEDES MOINES, IA 50309

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016metallic gift wrapping items; namely, metallic plastic ribbon, metallic plastic sheets, metallic plastic wrapped wire and metallic plastic shredABANDONEDOct 8, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 31, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 17, 1995ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 17, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 31, 1994EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 3, 1994CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 8, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 7, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 22, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 2, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 24, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance