Drawing for CA. SCHOOLCOM

USPTO serial 74118792

CA. SCHOOLCOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, CHERYL A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CA. SCHOOLCOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lester Rushin, III

LESTER RUSHIN III TRADEMARK ATTORNEYGTE SERVICE CORPORATIONONE STAMFORD FORUMSTAMFORD, CT 06904

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038electric mail servicesABANDONED—
041educational services; namely, conducting workshops in academic disiplines of English foreign languages and mathABANDONED—
042computer services; namely, leasing access time to computer databases and computer databases in the nature of computer bulletin boards used in the education field of provide activities in science, social studies, and language artsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 1994PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Nov 4, 1994PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED—
Jun 16, 1993PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 1993ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 26, 1992CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 13, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 27, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance