USPTO serial 74119054
FASTRACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANVILLE, ANNA W.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FASTRACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Olga M. Nedeltscheff
OLGA M NEDELTSCHEFF NIMS, HOWES, COLLISON, HANSEN & LACKERT605 THIRD AVE STE 3500NEW YORK, NY 10158UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | generation of plotted templates for optical tracing machines used in the manufacture of profiled shapes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 1994 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |