USPTO serial 74119479
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Bevilacqua
MICHAEL J BEVILACQUA HALE AND DORR60 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs for assigning portions of a problem, to be solved concurrently, to selected processors of a parallel processor computer system | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 19, 1993 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 23, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 12, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |