Drawing for BENEFIT

USPTO serial 74119488

BENEFIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BENEFIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Annette P. Heller

ANNETTE P HELLER HELLER & KEPLER721 EMERSON, STE 569ST LOUIS, MO 63141UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001grass fertilizer for commercial and residential lawnsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 16, 1994ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jan 18, 1994ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 22, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 13, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 29, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 29, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance