USPTO serial 74119969
STEEMER ULTRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1798501Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 12, 1993
- Examiner
- JEFFRIES, STEPHEN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with STEEMER ULTRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Atlanta, GA
Atlanta, GA
TECHTRONIC FLOOR CARE TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
TORTOLA, VG
Other trademarks owned by TECHTRONIC FLOOR CARE TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Atlanta, GA
CHEYENNE, WY
G. HEILEMAN BREWING COMPANY, INC.
La Crosse, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jacob Neu
Jacob Neu MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP100 EAST WISCONSIN AVENUESUITE 3300MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4108Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | carpet cleaner machines and shampoo cartridges therefore and parts thereof | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 2, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TRC Acquisition Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by TRC Acquisition Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by TECHTRONIC FLOOR CARE TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by TRC Acquisition Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by ORECK HOLDING, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by G. HEILEMAN BREWING COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named STEEMER ULTRA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2016 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 12, 2003 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 29, 2003 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2000 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 22, 2000 | PRA8 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 23, 1993 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 1, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 1992 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 20, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 28, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 27, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |