USPTO serial 74120370
LEADER BY DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEADER BY DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann O'Brien
ANN O'BRIEN LATHAM AND WATKINS633 W FIFTH ST STE 4000LOS ANGELES, CA 90071-2007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | bicycle components and accessories; namely, bicycle saddles, brakes, chains, handlebars, stems, seat posts, bicycle water bottles sold empty, and shifting gears | ABANDONED | Feb 15, 1990 |
| 025 | bicycle apparel; namely, sweatshirts, T-shirts, shorts, jerseys and hats | ABANDONED | Feb 15, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1993 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 1993 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 14, 1993 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 10, 1992 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jun 8, 1992 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 1992 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 10, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |