USPTO serial 74120648
HANDS-FREE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1801988Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 2, 1993
- Examiner
- COLE RICHARD G
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HANDS-FREE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BI-LINE CONVEYOR SYSTEMS LIMITED
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, CA
Mississauga, Ontario L4W 2K8, CA
Mississauga, Ontario L4W 2K8, CA
Mississauga, Ontario L4W 2K8, CA
Mississauga, Ontario L4W 2K8, CA
ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RONALD S. SPRINGER
RONALD S SPRINGER WOMBLE CARYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLCONE W FOURTH STWINSTON SALEM, NC 27101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | hand sanitizing station and hand washing station consisting of a hand sanitizing machine with a pump for pumping solution into the water line for the machine and a spray head | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 6, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BI-LINE CONVEYOR SYSTEMS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by HANDS-FREE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HANDS-FREE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BI-LINE CONVEYOR SYSTEMS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by HANDS-FREE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MOYER DIEBEL LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named HANDS-FREE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 15, 2004 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 3, 2003 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 10, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 25, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 18, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |