USPTO serial 74121116
TAMTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BILLINGS, JESSIE W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TAMTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John P. Bouxsein, III
JOHN P BOUXSEIN III181 W MADISON ST STE 4600CHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telephones; telephone alarm monitoring systems, comprising telephones, receivers, transmitters, infrared detectors, sound detectors and parts therefor; receivers and transmitters; smoke detectors; infrared detectors; door sensors; sound sensors; panic/hold-up systems, comprising panic buttons, receivers, transmitters, semiconductors and parts therefor; medical alert systems, comprising panic buttons, receivers, transmitters, semiconductors and parts therefor; anti-theft devices, comprising magnetic reed-relays and transmitters; siren/speaker and sound devices; namely, loudspeakers, electronic buzzers and sound producing semiconductors; semiconductor switching devices | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 20, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |