Drawing for OLYMPIC CHAMPION

USPTO serial 74121389

OLYMPIC CHAMPION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KREBS, CATHERINE K.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OLYMPIC CHAMPION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HAROLD I. KAPLAN

HAROLD I KAPLAN BLUM KAPLAN1120 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025polo shirts, sweatpants, sweatshirts, athletic shirts and running pants for men, women and children, and socksABANDONEDSep 25, 1930

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 1993EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 27, 1993ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 27, 1993EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 27, 1993EXPREX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED—
Mar 3, 1993CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 15, 1992CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 6, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 1992JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 22, 1992EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 12, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 5, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance