USPTO serial 74121421
MICRO ALERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MICRO ALERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul Herbert
PAUL HERBERT RICHES, MCKENZIE & HERBERTSTE 29002 BLOOR ST ETORONTO, ON M4W 3J5Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed matter; namely, periodical publications; namely, pamphlets, brochures, newsletters, journals, and manuals, all related to computer hardware and compute software | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | conducting business and market research surveys; business management consulting services; organizing and conducting trade show expositions in the field of computer hardware and software | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | book publication services; educational services; namely, conducting seminars in the field of computer hardware and software | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |