USPTO serial 74121545
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
8953 Dietikon, CH
8953 Dietikon, CH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-4141UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | body, facial, hand and toilet soap; perfumes, eau de cologne, talcum powder, toilet water, bubble bath, bath oils; skin lotions, creams, and oils; bath salts; essential oils for personal use, cosmetics; namely, eye shadow, mascara, facial powder, face make-up, lipstick, eyeliner, blush, eye make-up, foundation; hair care products; namely, shampoo, conditioner, sprays, gels, creams, and rinses | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 21, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 21, 1993 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 28, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |