Drawing for CORNELY

USPTO serial 74121555

CORNELY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1796621Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 5, 1993
Examiner
JEFFRIES, STEPHEN
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORNELY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GEORGE R. PETTIT

GEORGE R PETTIT CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ,LLP1990 M ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007industrial sewing machines, embroidery machines, punching machines, sequin setting machines, rhinestone setting machines, hemming machines and parts thereofEXPIREDAug 2, 1989
009tape readersEXPIREDAug 2, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2014CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Sep 18, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 28, 2003RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Aug 28, 200389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jun 9, 200389AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Jun 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 1999C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 25, 1999815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Oct 5, 1993R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 21, 1993CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jul 12, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 1993SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 6, 1993IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 28, 1992NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 5, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 3, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 5, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 27, 1991CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 25, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 25, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 19, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance