Drawing for CHEVIGNON TRADING POST

USPTO serial 74122397

CHEVIGNON TRADING POST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODPASTER, SCOTT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHEVIGNON TRADING POST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gordon D. Coplein

GORDON D COPLEIN DARBY & DARBY PC805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014jewelry, horological and chronometric instruments; namely, clocks, alarm clocks, watches, clock and watch cases, watch straps, watch chains, watch bands, sundials, clock casings and clock pendulumsABANDONED—
018shaving kit cases sold emptyABANDONED—
020furniture, shoe cleaning kit boxes sold emptyABANDONED—
021household and kitchen utensils; namely, pots, pans, bowls, plates, drinking glasses, platters, coasters, vases, baskets not of metal, flasks, candlesticks not of precious metals, shoe and clothing brushes, shoe cleaning cloths, shaving brushes, combs and comb cases, hairbrushes, cosmetic brushes, small boxes made of glass, porcelain and ceramicABANDONED—
024textile and textile goods; namely, fabrics used in the manufacture of clothing, upholstery and luggage; bedspreads, duvet covers, and bed linens; table covers; namely, table linens and tableclothsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 1994ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 12, 1993NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 20, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 18, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 29, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 23, 1992CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 27, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 16, 1992CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 10, 1992CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 1, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 18, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 1991CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 6, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance