USPTO serial 74122499
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Chongro-ku, Seoul, KR
Chongro-ku, Seoul, KR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald J. Tanis
RONALD J TANIS FLYNN, THIEL, BOUTELL & TANIS, PC2026 RAMBLING RDKALAMAZOO, MI 49008UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | bleaching preparations; soaps; namely, skin cleansing creams and astringents; perfumeries; namely, eau de toilette, eau de cologne and essence; essential oils; namely, baby oil, skin emollients, skin lotion, sun creams; cosmetics; namely, foundation, lipstick, rouge, face powder, mascara, eye shadow, eye pencil, and nail enamel; hair lotions; namely, shampoos, hair conditioning and hair rinses; dentifrices; and incenses | ABANDONED | May 26, 1989 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 10, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 10, 1993 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 3, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |