USPTO serial 74122531
BIOFOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, LAURA E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIOFOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cypress, CA
Cypress, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ascorbic acid, citric acid, beta carotene, lactic acid, potassium carbonate, potassium lactate, sodium erythorbate, sodium lactate, sodium citrate, sorbitol, rennet, ammonium bicarbonates, potassium phosphates, sodium phosphates, calcium sulphate, chemical preparations, (bases, blends, cures, mixes, mixtures) for use in binding, flavoring, forming, leavening, marinating and preserving in the manufacture of food | ABANDONED | — |
| 029 | dairy products; namely, non lactose milk, processed vegetables, processed fruits, maraschino cherries, egg substitutes, apple based berry substitute | ABANDONED | — |
| 031 | unprocessed fruits | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 1994 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Sep 8, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 1, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 9, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 11, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 18, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |